The Supreme Court ruled Monday that law enforcement’s use of a geofence warrant to obtain cellphone location data constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, marking a significant privacy ruling ...

Cops stopped a semitruck because of a drug tip, then tried to dress the illegal search up as a routine inspection.

Law enforcement officials frequently draw virtual fences around areas of interest and require Google to identify every cellphone in the area using cell location history. Dubbed a “geofence search,” ...

A federal judge ruled Thursday that US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents violated the Fourth Amendment rights of ...

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. In Big Win for Fourth Amendment Advocates, the Supreme Court Says 'Geofence Warrants' Count as a 'Search' The U.S. Supreme Court ...

Jason McCullough and Brandon Moss of Wiley Rein LLP examine the Supreme Court's decision in Chatrie v. United States, which ...

Geofence warrants compel tech companies like Google to provide information about electronic devices that are present in a given area on a particular date during a specific window ...

A recent New York court case upheld a murder conviction despite claims that DNA evidence used violated the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. The case highlights ongoing legal questions about ...

Suppose the police want to get illegal drugs off the streets. So they begin stopping pedestrians at gunpoint, shoving them against walls, frisking them, and searching their belongings. They also force ...

These libertarians with their prattling on about freedom and rights. They can be so tiresome. Please stop with the high dudgeon! Here’s an example of one such “freedom” person writing about open-ended ...

Dozens of states accommodate a massive exception to the Fourth Amendment guarantees in the Bill of Rights. A recent case in ...

Listen to “Does Chatrie Put Flock Cameras on Constitutional Thin Ice?” on Spreaker. Yes. The Supreme Court’s recent decision ...