Mar 21, 2019 · I have a quick question about RDFa and Microdata. My current understanding is that RDFa is RDF implemented into HTML but is complicated for new developers like myself, …

Jan 13, 2013 · RDFa is an attempt to get both the flexibility of RDF and the simplicity of microformats. Microdata was a response to RDFa, but with a different data model (roughly …

RDFa (Resource Description Framework in Attributes) is a technique that allows to express structured data in markup languages. It provides a set of attributes to augment the visual …

Mar 12, 2014 · The property attribute comes from RDFa. RDFa 1.1 extends HTML5 so that it’s valid to use meta and link elements in the body, as long as they contain a property attribute. …

Sep 28, 2015 · The lines between Microdata, RDFa, and JSON-LD are indeed currently very blurry and that there is still no widely accepted de facto among the three. This will have to wait …

Apr 14, 2013 · I am a bit confused about the semantics of websites. I understand that every URI should represent a ressource. I assume that all information provided by RDFa inside a …

Jul 17, 2015 · The vocab attribute is defined in RDFa 1.1, but with your current DOCTYPE, you are using RDFa 1.0. Your options: Keep using XHTML 1.1 and RDFa 1.0, and use the …

Mar 21, 2015 · Dublin Core and FOAF are schemas, i.e. vocabularies you can use to mark up your data. OWL (and RDFS) are languages for writing new schemas / vocabularies / …

Dec 4, 2011 · RDFa is really good, but it's complex and not that obvious to most. Microdata is clear, well defined and backed by Google, hence my recommendation to use that. On my …

Jun 29, 2016 · The table below lists the exceptions to this. We recommend using JSON-LD where possible. According to the mentioned table, Microdata and RDFa support all of Google’s data …